Spanish philosopher George Santayana stated, “Those who don’t know history are destined to repeat it.”
It appears with the rollout of specialist disability accommodation we have learnt nothing from the past in how to keep people with disability safe.
View the Kew Cottages history in brief
In April 1996 nine men were killed in a fire that swiftly and violently engulfed their unit at Kew Cottages, a residential institution for people with intellectual disability. But are the SDAs we are currently building any different?
Our Story MFB: Melbourne – Kew Cottages details the emergency services response
When I first arrived on the scene I heard a whole lot of screaming … they appeared to come from the area that we were trying to attack, it was beyond the area that we could access … I was unable to get beyond the door at the end of the small corridor and it appeared this was the main area of the fire and the area where the screams came from.
The Coroner concluded that all the men died from carbon monoxide poisoning and burns. An MFB report determined that the men died within six minutes and 30 seconds from the fire’s ignition. As the fire alarm was not raised until seven minutes 45 seconds later we can assume that the cries Michael heard were not from those who died.
The deaths of Ronald, Adrian, Thomas, Bruce, Stanley, Alan, Shayne, Peter and Joseph are forever remembered in a memorial within the old grounds of Kew Cottages.
On the evening of 8 April 1996, a fire occurred in Flat E, Unit 31 of Building 37 at Kew Residential Services
Tragically, the fire took the lives of nine intellectually impaired residents who required a high level of person to person support.
The investigation found the one constant is that such residents should be protected from the devastating effects of fire by the government and that that protection should have been in place to prevent the tragic events before they occurred.
The chapter, ‘Walking Ghosts’, from the book Bye-bye Charlie: Stories from the Vanishing World of Kew Cottages, written by Corinne Manning, UNSW Press 2008. Click here to read the full chapter.
When you realise how quickly it happens and what a violent event it is, it makes people realise how these things could have happened
It’s not something that took three quarters of an hour or an hour, where people would have had plenty of warning, it was all over in a few minutes
For ten years (since 1986), the State of Victoria had been given warning after warning by consultants, experts, personnel and different government instrumentalities as to the inadequacy of the fire safety system at Kew Residential Services.
Kew Cottages did not have sprinklers installed, the same as the majority of SDA or Specialist Disability Accommodation being built today.
What is worse SDAs are being built over multiple levels (up to 3 stories) without sprinklers. How can this be permitted? Have we not learnt from the tragedy of Kew Cottages the failure to provide sprinklers costs lives?
The NDIS Pricing Arrangement states:
A Class 3 — the building is a residential building providing long-term or transient accommodation for a number of unrelated persons, including the following:
To answer this question we must refer back to the Pricing Arrangements for Specialist Disability Accommodation to understand who SDA is provided for.
SDA funding is only provided for participants who meet the eligibility criteria.
Participants who meet the eligibility criteria will have an extreme functional impairment and/or very high support needs.
It is not just required for people that use wheelchairs that cannot self evacuate in fully accessible and high physical support categories. This is because of the range of disabilities all participants may have:
Participants will not be able to independently evacuate downstairs or may take a lot longer to evacuate due to their disability or because they use a walking frame, crutches or other mobility aid.
Participants may not react to smoke and fire alarms either delaying their evacuation or not knowing they need to evacuate.
Participants may not react to smoke and fire alarms due to deafness or participants with low vision cannot find their way out of a building due to low lighting levels.
NOTE: Remember, some participants will have multiple disabilities.
Table E1.5 Requirements for sprinklers
|Occupancy||Where sprinklers are required|
|Class 2 or 3 building (excluding a building used as a residential care building) and any other class of building (excluding a building used as a residential care building) containing a Class 2 or 3 part.||Throughout the whole building, including any part of another class, if any part of the building has a rise in storeys of 4 or more and an effective height of not more than 25 m.|
|Class 3 building used as a residential care building||Throughout the building and in any fire compartment containing a Class 3 part used for residential care.|
As a BCA Class 3(7) Residential Care Building is the only classification that mandates sprinklers to all parts of the buildings no matter the size up as Class 2 and remaining Class 3 buildings do not require sprinklers until the building has a rise in storeys of 4 or more and an effective height of more than 25m.
This is the only way safe specialist disability accommodation can be provided.
If a building has a 60-minute or 90-minute fire rating, what does that actually mean?
Sadly it is the latter, again compromising the life safety of people with disability.
The primary role of an OOA is the delivery of care
In my opinion, the OOA should not be responsible for emergency evacuation.
Who other than Emergency Services should evacuate SDA Participants?
Keep up with Specialist Disability Accommodation standards using our free e-newsletter. Save yourself the headache of complaints and expensive last-minute upgrades. Sign up here!